Today's Date:

Today's Bible Reading

 About CFCFFL 

Who is the CFCFFL?

The Movement for Restoration

Our Covenant

Our Mission and Vision

Our Statement of philosophy

Our Core Values


Family Ministries

Kids for Family and Life (KFL)  

Youth for Family and Life (YFL)

 Singles for Family and Life (SFL)

Handmaids for Family and Life (HFL)

Servants for Family and Life (SvFL)


Wish to JOIN?


The highest courage is to dare to be yourself in the face of adversity, choosing right over wrong, ethics over convenience, and truth over popularity.

Travel the path of integrity without looking back, for THERE IS NEVER A WRONG TIME TO DO THE RIGHT THING.

- Bishop Soc Villegas
25 July 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is a massive population control program
By Ligaya B. Anacta-Acosta
Inquirer News Service  /  http://news.inq7.net/opinion/index.php?index=1&story_id=31627
Editor's Note: Published on page A16 of the March 27, 2005 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer

I WAS an avid promoter of contraceptives when I was with the Department of Health (DOH). Promoting contraceptives is a very big part of DOH programs. There was, and still is, a lot of money for family planning.

For a long time, we have been told that contraceptives prevent conception. However, during the training I had undergone with Mercedes Arzu-Wilson, president of the Family of the Americas Foundation (FAF), it became clear to me that intrauterine devices (IUD) work essentially as an abortifacient. It does not prevent conception but causes constant inflammation and infection in the uterus. Thus, the newly conceived baby cannot implant in that kind of environment. No wonder then that the most common side effect suffered by IUD users is severe menstrual bleeding.

As our trainer said emphatically, "that was not ordinary blood, it was the baby being aborted in what is called micro-abortion." For pills and Depo-Provera, we learned that they make the endometrial lining and uterus dry and barren like a desert, thus, the newly conceived baby cannot implant as well.

Natural vs artificial

After my training in Manila, I conducted 10 batches of training for more than 300 midwives, nurses, doctors and parish pastoral workers. After watching the video titled "Natural vs Artificial" produced by the FAF, participants came one by one to testify (they were sobbing) that indeed all these things were happening to them and their clients.

I heard very dramatic testimonies of deaths (particularly due to pills and IUDs), ailments (most common of which were high blood pressure, ovarian cysts and cancers due to pills, and pelvic inflammatory diseases and infections brought about by IUDs), and couples and families being drawn apart by contraception and sterilization, which caused depression and reduction in libido. Some women using pills also reported mood disorders.

Health workers even shared, without my asking, the fact that tetanus toxoid immunization was indeed causing abortions. I was shocked. I remembered that during the height of the tetanus toxoid controversy, when former health secretary Juan Flavier first ran for senator, I was constantly on radio and TV defending it, since I was Flavier's campaign manager for Region 8 back then.

Losing babies

Today, I hear a lot of testimonies of women, who are between two to four months pregnant, losing their baby because they had been injected with that drug. Also, a lot of single women who had been injected with it can no longer achieve pregnancy.

I constantly gave this feedback to the health secretary and to my regional director in Region 8 but they didn't seem to care. It seemed that they were more concerned about our targets than the health of our people.

Through research, I discovered that the Philippines received an annual budget of $144 million in the mid-1990s for population control. The money was "used primarily in media, the House of Representatives and Senate affairs to help change people's views regarding contraception and family planning." Today, that amount has even increased.

I kept quiet for a long time. I knew too well that being an insider, and a spokesperson for the DOH, I would cause a scandal if I made an expose. The last straw, however, was Ligtas Buntis.

Deceptively named

Ligtas Buntis is a masked population control program, targeting men and women 15 years old and above­regardless of marital status. I found it very unusual that we just had our orientation on Jan. 17 but the program was ready for implementation by Feb. 1.

I also felt nauseated with the fact that we were partnering with Marie Stopes, an agency the DOH did not even accredit in the past, because it knows too well that the group is into abortion in the guise of menstrual and fertility regulation. Very deceptively named, Ligtas Buntis is nothing but the provision of contraceptives and sterilization services house-to-house. It is apparent that the DOH now considers pregnancy a disease like tigdas and polio. When I objected, my director told me to "separate [my] morality and [my] work."

I never thought that at my age I would be saying goodbye to government service. However, I thought I have only one life to live, so if I could offer this one life to make a difference in this world, so be it.

The DOH tries so hard in telling people that contraceptives are safe and that it is not true that these are abortifacients. But I have a copy of their bible, "The Essentials of Contraceptive Technology: A Handbook for Clinic Staff" published by the Johns Hopkins Population Information Program (March 2003), and funded by the United States Agency for International Development ( USAID).

That book details the possible side effects of each and every contraceptive and sterilization service. And even if that book makes horrible side effects look normal in a very deceitful way, on pages 12 to 14 for IUD, it says, "possibly could prevent egg from implanting in the wall of uterus." Let us not be deceived. That is synonymous to abortion.

The DOH is even trying to redefine human life to start from implantation rather than from conception as very clearly stated in Article II, Section 12 of the Philippine Constitution.

As I told the health secretary when he called me last January (right after I was relieved as natural family planning program manager because of my change of heart regarding contraceptives), I now know exactly why, despite spending billions of dollars over a period of more than 35 years, we only have a 35 percent contraceptive prevalence rate. It is because our products are intrinsically defective. However hard we promote them, people don't buy them because of the horrible side effects they experience.

Men and women are forced to resort to sterilization because they are not aware that it too has a lot of ill effects. In fact, the Matching Grant Program implemented by the DOH through a grant from the USAID-funded Management Sciences for Health is massively promoting vasectomy.

DOH people vow that they are pro-life. In fact, one of the four principles of the DOH family planning program is "respect for life." But when you promote contraception, you can never call yourself pro-life. That's why it's called contraception. It is against conception or against the birth of human life.

Abortion mentality

The DOH also fondly argues that it is anti-abortion. But I have found in my research that it is common knowledge around the globe except at the DOH that many contraceptives are indeed abortifacients. I have also found that the Church statement that a contraceptive mentality leads to an abortion mentality is true.

Because women who take contraceptives don't like to have a child, when they get pregnant (since no contraception is 100-percent effective) it is very easy for them to go to the next step of having an abortion. The womb, which should be the safest place on earth, has become a tomb for countless number of children. As Mother Teresa of Calcutta puts it, "if we accept that a mother can kill her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"

Obviously, there is a need to revisit and overhaul government priorities, particularly its continuing effort to promote population control despite overwhelming evidence that there is no overpopulation.

Political pressure

The roots of the government's family planning program are deep, with a tangle of branches entwined in public programs. The intricate complex of power and money, fed by an annual flow of millions of dollars in grants, not only supports population programs but also finances lobbying to sustain the programs.

The claim that the poor lack access to family planning services is untenable. If the poor "lack access and want more birth control," why should government programs like Ligtas Buntis need to exert such tremendous pressure on them? Why go to the extent of conducting a house-to-house campaign? And why go to the extent of harassing health workers like me who choose not to support the program?

I'm not saying that couples should not plan their families. You must know, however, that there is a tremendous difference between family planning and population control. Family planning implies that the decision is made by the couple, taking into account their own belief and circumstances-financial or otherwise-regarding the number and spacing of their children. Population control measures, in contrast, are implemented by governments and international agencies after they have determined the number of children per couple.

Gift of love

Genuine family planning gives couples control over their reproductive behavior. Population control relinquishes this right to the government and international agencies. As Mother Teresa puts it, "The way to plan the family is natural family planning not contraception. In destroying the power of giving life through contraception, a husband or wife is doing something to self.

"This turns the attention to self and so it destroys the gift of love in him or her. In loving, the husband and wife must turn the attention to each other as happens in natural family planning, and not to self as happens in contraception. Once that living love is destroyed, abortion easily follows."

Shifting public health policy from contraceptives to natural family planning will considerably bring down the expenses of our cash-strapped government and will rid us of graft and corruption brought about by the multimillion dollar grants. Natural family planning will truly promote health because there are no side effects. It can also be taught and learned by anyone. More importantly, it will bring back the needed sense of values and morality not only in government but also between and among couples and families.

(Acosta is a former information officer of the Department of Health and its regional program manager for natural family planning for Eastern Visayas.)

Copyright 2007 Couples for Christ Foundation for Family & Life

CFCFFL Canada

E-Mail: cfcffl@cfcfflcanada.org
CFC-FFL Webmaster E-Mail:
webmaster@cfcfflcanada.org